Author archive

Author Archive

Planning and weather; and introduction

This blog post forms the basis for discussing some useful methods for dealing with the weather in the development of your planning.
A time schedule might be set up with the utmost care. It can be of top quality and resulting from the collaboration of whole teams of experienced professionals. Several working methods might have been studied and historical production rates analysed and amended for the new project. Actual performance will be very close to the initial baseline, won’t it? Of course, you know where I am going with this, especially because you know the title of this blogpost.

The project manager, overseeing the development of the project schedule, to a certain degree will always be victim to the planning fallacy and underestimate the risks involved in execution. Some of those risks are related to weather and this article will set the stage for discussing some useful methods for dealing with weather when developing a schedule.

Note that actual methods for incorporating weather risks into the planning are addressed in the blogpost “Planning and Weather – Acceptable methods” (to be published soon).

What is adverse weather?

First of all, we are not talking about ‘bad weather’. That is too loosely defined and subjective. In planning, we use the term ‘adverse weather’, where adverse means ‘having a negative or harmful effect on something’. Activities can be hindered by wind, precipitation, frost and humidity and sequentially mud, ice or reduced visibility. But some activities like painting or concrete works can also be adversely influenced by heat or draught. The negative effect could be a production rate which is lower than planned: precise outdoor crane work will take significantly longer on a windy day compared to the same hoisting job executed indoors. But those same crane works can also become impossible if strong gusts of wind follow each other up too frequently. In that case we talk about postponed and suspended activities.

Figure 1: Dust storm in Western Australia during the 2012-2013 cyclone season, messing up the planning of multiple on- and offshore projects

Closely related to this is “sea state”. Offshore construction projects suffer not only from weather, but also from waves, swell and current, together known as sea state. Marine equipment will have specific threshold values, depending on the equipment and activities to be executed, above which work will be suspended.


Many contracts in the construction industry will include clauses regulating the settlement of weather impact. In a lumpsum contract, a certain amount of non-work days can be included in the contract price – e.g. the impact of weather conditions with a probability of occurrence of 50%. If the contractor experiences more delays than foreseen (and objective weather data supports this), he is usually entitled to an extension of time, but no money. These are excusable, non-compensable events to speak in terms of our change control and forensic schedule analysis trainings. Those additional delays are caused by what we call “excessive weather”: weather conditions in excess of what was foreseen in the contract.

To make it more concrete, let’s have a look at table 1. The contract can for example include information on the ‘expected’ workability, here shown as the expected number of non-work days. Those are valid for specific equipment, locations and activities only, however for simpler projects they might apply for all the works and for the whole site. In the latter case, this means that in December, the project is expected to have no progress for 7 days and those days are included in the price or paid for. Any non-working days in excess of 7 for December are usually not reimbursable, but an extension of time for completing the works might be granted (potentially only after correcting for the differences during the other months).

Table 1: Example of non-work days per month


Not to confuse yourself, you should always know your durations. Make the distinction between net duration, contingency (to cover risks), weather downtime (WDT) and gross duration. Let’s immediately discuss an example.

Assume a weather sensitive activity which – in perfect conditions – is expected to take 60 days to be executed. Net duration thus equals 60 days. Assume no provision for risks other than weather. How should you now calculate the gross duration? Have a look at table 1: it clearly depends on when you plan to execute the activity. When you plan a start date on the 1st of June, you only need to account for 3 days of WDT (2 days in June, 1 day in July and WDT in August is negligible). See also Figure 2.

Now, imagine that the start of the activity is delayed to 1st of November due to fabrication issues. The net duration is obviously still 60 days. But what WDT should we now take into account? Well, the sum of expected WDT in November (5 days), December (7 days) and a bit in January. At the 31st of December, we expect to have on average 11 days of net duration which still has to be executed. Assuming even distribution of the 6 days WDT in January, we can attribute approximately one third of this to the activity, or 2 days. In Figure 2 you can see this summarized.

Figure 2: WDT in summer and winter

This example proves the importance of the use of a proper method for planning weather impact: Delaying an activity can have a large impact on its gross duration. Several methods – see our future blogpost Planning and Weather – Acceptable methods – are available and they all have their merits in specific situations.


When planning weather sensitive activities, don’t forget to take the possible impact of adverse weather into account. It starts with finding and analysing historical weather data and implement them in a sound way in your schedule. To be able to do this, you have to be familiar with the equipment to be used and their limits. Also, the contractual determinations and implications of weather-related delays should be fully understood for proper administration of these events. Do not hesitate to involve professionals to guide the way: being in control of this essential part of your planning will prove to be very rewarding.

Gert Truyensby Gert Truyens

Read more

Change Control: 4 Levels of Change

Gert Truyens explains what the different levels of change are, what they mean and how you can deal with them.

Managing change will always be a challenge in projects. Its importance cannot be overestimated in order to successfully deliver projects. Messing up will have huge implications in a claim-oriented environment. Still we see many project teams struggling with organizing and following a proper change management process.

A first step which proved to be of great help, is differentiating between several levels of change. To do this, we start by defining 5 levels on which projects are managed.

Gert Truyensby Gert Truyens

Read more

Primavera P6 and the Longest Path

There is more to showing THE Critical Path in Primavera than your project manager can imagine. Primavera allows you to change certain settings to define the criticality of activities: you can define a threshold value for total float, or choose for the longest path instead of a total float-based critical path.

Gert Truyensby Gert Truyens

Read more

Help! My baseline bars are in the wrong place!

When I started working with Primavera P6, I had a colleague who showed me how you can use ‘global change’ to make sure that your baseline bars are showing the right information. It was fairly simple: you just amended the planned dates to the dates you want in the baseline, and it’s done. Hu? Primavera is not capable of managing baselines? Of course, something else is going on. Like so often, Primavera turns out to be so powerful and versatile that one really needs to understand what’s under the hood to properly operate the system.

Gert Truyensby Gert Truyens

Read more

Schedule Quality: Technical Requirements

As consultants, we frequently come across schedules of substandard quality. You’ve probably seen our top-picks of mistakes as well: overuse of SF-relationships, too many constraints or even the absence of links between the activities. We receive requests to perform a schedule quality analysis more often these days, so it seems that the market starts understanding the importance of quality standards.

Gert Truyensby Gert Truyens

Read more